I have been skeptical of variable universal life insurance policies (VULs) since they became popular enough to show up on my radar screen in the late 1980s.
In the beginning my skepticism was just instinct. Then experience proved that it wasn’t misplaced. Though I have been consistent in my published columns, I continue to refine how we should think about and treat variable universal life. This article is probably my bottom line on this type of insurance policy.
Almost all clients view variable universal life as similar to whole life and universal life, buying these policies for family protection or associated with estate planning. But as we will see, variable universal life policies are very different.
Virtually all variable universal life policies I have reviewed have these characteristics: a.) illustrated (represented based on hypothetical assumptions) to have level death benefits from the day purchased until death; b.) invested in risky sub-accounts [primarily stocks]; and c.) a premium that the client believes is his or her “policy’s premium.” Buyers of variable universal life are very loyal to their premium. The premium is based on an assumed constant investment yield that the selling agent selects during the sales process, which they justify based on some construct of historical data. The constant investment yield is mandated by regulators.